🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of states are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". A law may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors except if guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful starting point," stated a leading MEP driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the local level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some figures to copy Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of the West, other countries are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more measured position. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

Even as this global discussion continues, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.